This essay explores terms referring to ‘bird (in general)’ in eastern Indonesian languages and considers the extent to which these systematically label a life-form taxon. All belonging to the Central-Malayo-Polynesian group, the languages reveal four ways in which the general category of ‘bird’ is designated: with (1) a reflex of a Malayo-Polynesian protoform reconstructed as *manuk, (2) a descriptive phrase meaning ‘flying animal’, (3) a term originally referring to a particular kind of bird, and (4) a term apparently denoting a more general category of ‘wild creatures’. While the first pattern is exclusive to languages of Timor and the Moluccas (Esser's ‘Ambon-Timor’ group), reflexes of *manuk are also widespread in languages of central and western Flores and Sumba (Esser's ‘Bima-Sumba’ group), where they occur as a specific term for the domestic fowl (Gallus gallus) and in compound names for a number of other ethno-ornithological folk generics. The implications of the pattern are discussed with reference to evolutionary schemes proposed by Berlin and Brown, and to a recent re-interpretation of the protoform *manuk advanced by Blust.
How to translate text using browser tools
1 September 2006
WORDS FOR ‘BIRD’ IN EASTERN INDONESIA
GREGORY FORTH
ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE
It is not available for individual sale.
This article is only available to subscribers.
It is not available for individual sale.
It is not available for individual sale.
Central-Malayo-Polynesian languages
eastern Indonesia
ethnozoological/ethno-ornithological nomenclature
life-form taxa
protolanguages